01 / 09
Portfolio at a glance.
02 / 09
The record over time.
03 / 09
Case file.
04 / 09
The buildings.
05 / 09
Ownership & operations.
06 / 09
Tenant voice.
07 / 09
Where they operate.
08 / 09
Compare & act.
09 / 09
Questions, answered.
NYC
How RUTLAND PARTNERS LLC shows up on public housing records.
Full ownership history (ACRIS deeds, prior sales, linked LLCs) ships in a later pass — some portfolios span dozens of entities that take time to reconcile.
Every time a tenant calls 311, an inspector cites a violation, or a case lands in housing court, it shows up here. The numbers below aggregate across the entire portfolio.
Adjudicated DOB / ECB cases across this portfolio. Every ticket that went to adjudication — paid, dismissed, or defaulted.
Reviews submitted by tenants across every building in this portfolio. We aggregate the numbers, but surface the voices — good and bad — as pulled quotes.
“Pros: They keep the common areas clean. Appliances are new Cons: Floors are of bad quality and lift in some areas Took a few months to get the microwave fixed.”
— 385 RUTLAND ROAD · BrooklynThey rank among the tracked portfolios by building count among tracked landlords in New York City.
57% of their units are registered as rent-stabilized with the housing authority.
1 active housing-court litigations are on file across their buildings.
The worst-rated buildings are 383 RUTLAND ROAD, 385 RUTLAND ROAD, and —.
Violations are tracked 0% over the last 24 months.
The head officer runs the portfolio since an unknown year, registered with the local housing authority.
This landlord owns or manages 2 buildings across New York City. The portfolio sits above average on compliance for the city.