01 / 09
Portfolio at a glance.
02 / 09
The record over time.
03 / 09
Case file.
04 / 09
The buildings.
05 / 09
Ownership & operations.
06 / 09
Tenant voice.
07 / 09
Where they operate.
08 / 09
Compare & act.
09 / 09
Questions, answered.
NYC
Every time a tenant calls 311, an inspector cites a violation, or a case lands in housing court, it shows up here. The numbers below aggregate across the entire portfolio.
They rank among the tracked portfolios by building count among tracked landlords in New York City.
99% of their units are registered as rent-stabilized with the housing authority.
0 active housing-court litigations are on file across their buildings.
The worst-rated buildings are 35-43 84 STREET, —, and —.
Violations are tracked 0% over the last 24 months.
The head officer runs the portfolio since an unknown year, registered with the local housing authority.
This landlord owns or manages 1 building across New York City. The portfolio sits below average on compliance for the city.
How LITCHFIELD shows up on public housing records.
Full ownership history (ACRIS deeds, prior sales, linked LLCs) ships in a later pass — some portfolios span dozens of entities that take time to reconcile.
Reviews submitted by tenants across every building in this portfolio. We aggregate the numbers, but surface the voices — good and bad — as pulled quotes.
“Pros: Clean, spacious, nice area Cons: Rodents , package theft, and won’t fix small needed repairs, pricey Advice to landlord: Should exterminate Repair more Add moreover cameras to prevent theft. Even if theft accrue they won’t check cam…”
— 35-43 84 STREET · QueensAdjudicated DOB / ECB cases across this portfolio. Every ticket that went to adjudication — paid, dismissed, or defaulted.