Compared to median rents in 10001, Manhattan
§ 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 HMC, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( C) MDL AND 28 RCNY §25-171: REPLACE OR REPAIR THE SELF-CLOSING DOORS THAT IS MISSING OR DEFECTIVE HINGES AT EGRESS DOOR IN THE 5th ROOM FROM EAST LOCATED AT APT UNIT3, 3rd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM WEST AT NORTH
Apt: UNIT3
§ 27-2026, 2027 HMC: PROPERLY REPAIR THE SOURCE AND ABATE THE EVIDENCE OF A WATER LEAK AT CEILING IN THE 4th ROOM FROM EAST LOCATED AT APT UNIT3, 3rd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM WEST AT NORTH
Apt: UNIT3
§ 27-2005 ADM CODE REPAIR THE BROKEN OR DEFECTIVE PLASTERED SURFACES AND PAINT IN A UNIFORM COLOR AT CEILING, WEST AND SOUTH WALLS IN THE PRIVATE HALLWAY LOCATED AT APT UNIT3, 3rd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM WEST AT NORTH
Apt: UNIT3
§ 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 HMC, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( C) MDL AND 28 RCNY §25-171: REPLACE OR REPAIR THE SELF-CLOSING DOORS THAT IS MISSING OR DEFECTIVE HINGES IN THE ENTRANCE LOCATED AT APT UNIT3, 3rd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM WEST AT NORTH
Apt: UNIT3
§ 27-2005 ADM CODE REPAIR THE BROKEN OR DEFECTIVE PLASTERED SURFACES AND PAINT IN A UNIFORM COLOR AT CEILING IN THE 4th ROOM FROM EAST LOCATED AT APT UNIT3, 3rd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM WEST AT NORTH
Apt: UNIT3
§ 27-2026, 2027 HMC: PROPERLY REPAIR THE SOURCE AND ABATE THE EVIDENCE OF A WATER LEAK AT CEILING AND WEST WALL IN THE PRIVATE HALLWAY LOCATED AT APT UNIT3, 3rd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM WEST AT NORTH
Apt: UNIT3
§ 27-2005 ADM CODE PROPERLY REPAIR WITH SIMILAR MATERIAL THE BROKEN OR DEFECTIVE FIRE RETARDANT MATERIAL CEILING AT PUBLIC HALL, 5th STORY
§ 27-2013 ADM CODE PAINT WITH LIGHT COLORED PAINT TO THE SATISFACTION OF THIS DEPARTMENT CEILING AT PUBLIC HALL, 5th STORY
§ 27-2046.1 HMC: REPAIR OR REPLACE THE CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTING DEVICE(S). DEFECTIVE IN THE ENTIRE APARTMENT LOCATED AT APT 2, 2nd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM EAST AT SOUTH
Apt: 2
§ 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 HMC, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( C) MDL AND 28 RCNY §25-171: REPLACE OR REPAIR THE SELF-CLOSING DOORS THAT IS MISSING OR DEFECTIVE HINGES IN THE ENTRANCE LOCATED AT APT 2, 2nd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM EAST AT SOUTH
Apt: 2
§ 27-2005 ADM CODE REPAIR THE ROOF SO THAT IT WILL NOT LEAK ABOVE THE CEILING AT PUBLIC HALL, 5th STORY
§ 27-2045 ADM CODE REPAIR OR REPLACE THE SMOKE DETECTOR DEFECTIVE IN THE ENTIRE APARTMENT LOCATED AT APT 2, 2nd STORY, 1st APARTMENT FROM EAST AT SOUTH
Apt: 2
§27-2107 ADM CODE OWNER FAILED TO FILE A VALID REGISTRATION STATEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT AS REQUIRED BY ADM CODE §27-2097 AND IS THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CIVIL PENALTIES, PROHIBITED FROM CERTIFYING VIOLATIONS, AND DENIED THE RIGHT TO RECOVER POSSESSION OF PREMISES FOR NONPAYMENT OF RENT UNTIL A VALID REGISTRATION STATEMENT IS FILED.
(A) § HMC:FILE ANNUAL BEDBUG REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH HPD RULE AS DESCRIBED ON THE BACK OF THIS NOTICE OF VIOLATION OR AS DESCRIBED ON HPDS WEBSITE, WWW.NYC.GOV\HPD, SEARCH BED BUGS.
(A) § HMC:FILE ANNUAL BEDBUG REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH HPD RULE AS DESCRIBED ON THE BACK OF THIS NOTICE OF VIOLATION OR AS DESCRIBED ON HPDS WEBSITE, WWW.NYC.GOV\HPD, SEARCH BED BUGS.
Latest data: March 2026. This building has not been actively listed recently.
Studio
$5,374/mo
1BR
$6,638/mo
2BR
$9,384/mo
Based on listing data
Potential savings: ~44% by timing your move
Based on HUD Fair Market Rent estimates for this ZIP code
of tenants recommend
Based on 3 verified reviews
“Pros: Close to bars, restaurants and other attractions in Chelsea. Affordable for the neighborhood. Cons: Relatively far away from subway. Apartment”
— Anonymous, Jul 2020
“Pros: I liked the super, Joe. He was very sweet Cons: Management (Tassos) is horrible. Lived here for 2 years and my unit was constantly infested wit”
— Anonymous, Nov 2021
Anonymous
2 years ago
Pros: this building is right on the highline which is wonderful but that is pretty much the extent of the delight. Cons: the landlords are hard to get in touch with. The heat is uncontrollable and will have you sweating the whole winter, and it is by far the noisiest heating in all of nyc that I've ever experienced. any mold or rodent complaints I had were ignored by the super. they always list this building as "laundry in basement" on rental websites which is incorrect... there's a wash and fold around the corner. garbage should be better kept after.
Anonymous
4 years ago
Pros: I liked the super, Joe. He was very sweet Cons: Management (Tassos) is horrible. Lived here for 2 years and my unit was constantly infested with mice even though I was incredibly clean, never left food out and patched up all visible holes. They rarely responded to my requests to have the problem addressed and they were incredibly rude. Advice to landlord: Be nice to your tenants who are paying a lot of money to live in your crappy building.
Anonymous
5 years ago
Pros: Close to bars, restaurants and other attractions in Chelsea. Affordable for the neighborhood. Cons: Relatively far away from subway. Apartments are small. Seems to have originally been one or two bedroom apartments, turned into three-bedroom units. The third room is very small and not well ventilated. The building’s super can sometimes be rude with complaints and does not immediatly provide a solution to problems. Advice to landlord: I would recommend considering hiring a new super
17 questions answered
Based on recent listing data, rent for a studio at 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 ranges from $2,618 to $3,542 per month, with a median of $3,080.
Based on recent listing data, rent for a 1-bedroom at 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 ranges from $2,737 to $3,703 per month, with a median of $3,220.
Based on recent listing data, rent for a 2-bedroom at 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 ranges from $3,026 to $4,094 per month, with a median of $3,560.
Based on recent listing data, rent for a 3-bedroom at 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 ranges from $3,774 to $5,106 per month, with a median of $4,440.
Based on recent listing data, rent for a 4-bedroom at 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 ranges from $4,072 to $5,509 per month, with a median of $4,790.
Based on available records, 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 is not currently registered as rent stabilized. Rents at this building are likely set at market rate.
The registered owner of 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 is PRADERA REALTY CORP. You can view their full portfolio of buildings on Lucid Rents.
315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001, owned by PRADERA REALTY CORP, has an overall grade of D (2.7/10) on Lucid Rents. The building has 15 recorded violations. Tenants have left 3 reviews. Check tenant reviews for firsthand experiences.
315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 has an overall grade of D with a score of 2.7 out of 10 on Lucid Rents. This score is based on violations, complaints, and tenant reviews.
Yes, 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 has 15 housing violations and 8 complaints on record. Visit the building page on Lucid Rents to see the full history, including violation classes and complaint types.
Yes, 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 has 5 Department of Buildings violations on record. These can include issues related to construction safety, building codes, and structural concerns.
315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 has 8 litigations on record with the housing agency. Case types include: Heat and Hot Water, Tenant Action.
315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 offers 2 amenities including Has Evictions, Good Cause. View the full amenity list on the building page.
There are 3 schools near 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001, including 1 charter school, 2 colleges. Nearby schools include Success Academy Charter School - Hudson Yards (12 min walk), Pratt Institute Manhattan Cntr (18 min walk), Pacific College Of Health & Science (20 min walk).
The 10001 zip code where 315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 is located has 1,795 crime incidents on record. Check the neighborhood report card for 10001 for a full breakdown by crime type.
315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 was built in 1905, has 5 floors, contains 9 total units, 8 of which are residential.
315 10 AVENUE, Manhattan, NY, 10001 has 3 tenant reviews with an average rating of 2.7 out of 10. 0 out of 3 reviewers would recommend this building.