01 / 09
Portfolio at a glance.
02 / 09
The record over time.
03 / 09
Case file.
04 / 09
The buildings.
05 / 09
Ownership & operations.
06 / 09
Tenant voice.
07 / 09
Where they operate.
08 / 09
Compare & act.
09 / 09
Questions, answered.
NYC
How SU, TANCHENG shows up on public housing records.
Full ownership history (ACRIS deeds, prior sales, linked LLCs) ships in a later pass — some portfolios span dozens of entities that take time to reconcile.
Every time a tenant calls 311, an inspector cites a violation, or a case lands in housing court, it shows up here. The numbers below aggregate across the entire portfolio.
Reviews submitted by tenants across every building in this portfolio. We aggregate the numbers, but surface the voices — good and bad — as pulled quotes.
“Pros: Close to the train station and the park. Cons: Raccoons seem to make their way down from the park and try to get into the garbage.”
— 85-05 91 STREET · QueensThey rank among the tracked portfolios by building count among tracked landlords in New York City.
0% of their units are registered as rent-stabilized with the housing authority.
0 active housing-court litigations are on file across their buildings.
The worst-rated buildings are 85-05 91 STREET, —, and —.
Violations are tracked 0% over the last 24 months.
The head officer runs the portfolio since an unknown year, registered with the local housing authority.
This landlord owns or manages 1 building across New York City. The portfolio sits above average on compliance for the city.