SOUTHBRIDGE TOWERS INC · avg 3.7 ★★★★★ · New York City
“Pros: The building is very conveniently placed by many subway lines, in a safe street (I can comfortably walk here at night, although be wary of Fulton St which seems to be sketchy day or night time). The building has elevators, and nice, thick walls. Cons: The management seems to be a bit interesting. There is a doorman, but their hours are very unpredictable and not 24/7. When I've asked for specific hours (so I can anticipate when to send packages, etc.), they don't give them. There is a general roach problem, which the building management will send a terminator to deal with, but they will pop up in your apartment unit, in the trash rooms, or even in the laundry in the basement. There are elevators, but they are somehow always being serviced on so you'll likely only have access to 2, which serves all 27 floors, so you will need to wait.”
— 80 GOLD STREET · Manhattan“Pros: Pest Control was very responsive. Kind staff. Lots of families. Safe area. Cons: Radiators would break and become loud and took management multiple tries to fix.”
— 80 GOLD STREET · Manhattan“Pros: Great People great area to live Cons: The building owners do not take care of there plumbing hot water holding tanks which causes the hot water to run for at least 45 min the color of rust like brown urinate if you live in any of the Southbridge Towers Building in the downtown Manhattan area 10038 I would suggest installing a good drinking water filter such as an RO filter the management team is constantly functioning in the red and the cost of the mismanagement is bringing up the Mantnance but only to the individuals in the development who can afford it by bring up the cost of all the amenities such as Parking, storage, & renting gathering areas some and not all had to pay an additional 5000.00 + in Maintnance because of the mismanagement Advice to landlord: Stop mismanaging the property your going to bankrupt the Southbridge Towers development and every tenant should be subject to pay there fair share. The biggest problem is management taking orders from politically picked representative of the development these individuals don’t have the best interest of the people or individuals in the development just bending the rules for themselves to make money or just represent 1/4 of the development”