01 / 09
Portfolio at a glance.
02 / 09
The record over time.
03 / 09
Case file.
04 / 09
The buildings.
05 / 09
Ownership & operations.
06 / 09
Tenant voice.
07 / 09
Where they operate.
08 / 09
Compare & act.
09 / 09
Questions, answered.
NYC
How BURDEN CRESCENT shows up on public housing records.
Full ownership history (ACRIS deeds, prior sales, linked LLCs) ships in a later pass — some portfolios span dozens of entities that take time to reconcile.
Reviews submitted by tenants across every building in this portfolio. We aggregate the numbers, but surface the voices — good and bad — as pulled quotes.
“Pros: Spacious apartment and a great super. Cons: The hallways and common areas could use an update. The leasing office could also be more responsive to requests. Advice to landlord: A new coat of paint in the hallways would make a world…”
— 140-55 BURDEN CRESCENT · QueensThey rank among the tracked portfolios by building count among tracked landlords in New York City.
10% of their units are registered as rent-stabilized with the housing authority.
4 active housing-court litigations are on file across their buildings.
The worst-rated buildings are 140-55 BURDEN CRESCENT, —, and —.
Violations are tracked 0% over the last 24 months.
The head officer runs the portfolio since an unknown year, registered with the local housing authority.
Adjudicated DOB / ECB cases across this portfolio. Every ticket that went to adjudication — paid, dismissed, or defaulted.
Every time a tenant calls 311, an inspector cites a violation, or a case lands in housing court, it shows up here. The numbers below aggregate across the entire portfolio.
This landlord owns or manages 1 building across New York City. The portfolio sits around the city average on compliance.